Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 3 Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District explains AGR funding, K–3 strategies and upcoming five‑year application
Summary
District staff presented the state’s AGR (Achievement Gap Reduction) program and local use of AGR funds to support K–3 instruction, instructional coaching and class‑size strategies; staff said AGR funding averages about $1 million per year and the district’s application is due June 16.
Get email alerts on the K 3 Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Verona Area School District staff briefed the board on AGR (Achievement Gap Reduction), the state program that replaced SAGE, and explained how the district uses AGR funds to support K–3 instruction through instructional coaching and class‑size strategies.
Presenters said AGR is a state funding program targeted at K–3 sites; the district’s four neighborhood elementary schools are AGR sites. District staff explained the program’s history (SAGE to AGR) and said the district’s use of AGR funds typically supports instructional coaches and helps maintain lower class sizes in early grades. Presenters said AGR funding for the district averages about $1 million per year and that application materials for the next five‑year AGR contract are due to the state on June 16.
Staff also explained the district’s choice of measurement tools: historically the district used STAR assessments and is transitioning K–3 early‑literacy measurement to aimsweb as part of a broader plan to align data protocols across schools. The AGR contract requires district reporting in fall, winter and end‑of‑year windows; presenters said those reports will continue to be available to the board and posted in linked materials. Presenters noted the AGR contract is a five‑year application process and explained the district’s approach to planning and statewide allocation methods.
Board members asked clarifying questions about how AGR allocations are determined and the relationship between the state‑issued spreadsheet and district planning. Staff said the application and reporting process is a standard requirement and that the district will continue to report updates twice a year; no board action was required.
The board accepted the report; there was no vote on a policy or allocation during the meeting.

