Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Care topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nevada Senate passes broad health-care bill after debate over freestanding emergency rooms
Summary
The Nevada Senate passed SB 495, a package of changes to state health-care law, after debate and a 13–8 vote in which critics warned amendments could harm access to care at freestanding emergency departments.
The Nevada Senate passed Senate Bill 495, a health-care measure from the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, after a roll-call vote of 13 yeas and 8 nays that sent the bill back to the Assembly for enrollment.
The vote concludes several hours of consideration and an amendment process in which senators said the bill revises provisions related to health care. Opponents argued late changes reduced access to emergency care at freestanding emergency departments.
Senate Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro moved the amendment package and floor consideration. The bill, as described on the floor, "revises provisions relating to health care" and was taken up with amendment number 942. Senator DeNate moved to adopt the amendment and the amendment was carried before final passage.
Senator Dina Titus, speaking in opposition on final consideration, said the bill had been beneficial earlier in the session but "as it happens in this body sometimes at this ninth hour, some things get amended into a bill that then takes that good bill and that good bill will now do harm." Titus specifically raised concerns about freestanding emergency rooms, saying the changes "would do to them and the decrease in access to the care." She concluded: "I'm gonna urge my colleagues to vote no on this bill."
Senators voting to pass the bill achieved the constitutional majority required to send SB 495 back to the Assembly. The clerk recorded 13 yes votes and 8 no votes; the presiding officer declared the bill passed and ordered to the Assembly.
Discussion and debate on the floor focused on how recent amendments affect access to care — opponents warned of reduced access at certain emergency facilities, while supporters argued the package advances broader goals of improving health-care access and implements provisions requested by the committee. The Senate did not record additional floor instructions or a referral for further study before passage.
SB 495 will now return to the Assembly for concurrence with the Senate’s actions and any enrollment steps required before it can proceed to the governor.
