Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consumer Complaints topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consumer Protection staff say anonymous complaints hamper investigations
Summary
Staff from the Consumer Protection Department told the panel that anonymous complaints are harder to substantiate, described investigative steps inspectors take and noted three recent closed files.
Janita, a Consumer Protection Department staff member, told the Consumer Protection Department meeting that anonymous complaints make it difficult for investigators to substantiate allegations and that inspectors instead rely on respondent interviews and on-site visits.
"When a file is submitted by an anonymous person, it makes it difficult to prove the allegations," Janita said, describing the department's typical process: contact the respondent, visit the respondent's shop or place of business, educate the respondent about the allegations and, when required, document prescan/postscan or other evidence in the file.
The department reported three files that were closed. Janita said inspectors try to follow up on recurring allegations by flagging prior complaints in the case assignment notes and assigning a more in-depth investigation when names or patterns reappear. "When I assign a new one, I will put in my note when I assign it to the inspector that we've had priors," she said.
Janita told the meeting the department emphasizes education to respondents and warns of legal consequences when investigators can substantiate violations. She said, "since February, you can get a class B misdemeanor arrest for working without a license," and staff discuss fines and criminal consequences with respondents when applicable.
Board members asked for company-level information in some cases. Janita said the department licenses individuals rather than companies and that a company name might appear in a complaint file only if it was listed in the original report. "We license the people, not the companies," she said. She offered to check complaint files if the board wanted specific company names.
No formal action was taken during the discussion. The report was informational; several members asked clarifying questions and the panel moved on to other agenda items.
