Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Civility topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Orland Park board adopts civility pledge after heated public debate

3623287 · June 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees adopted a ‘Declaration of Civility’ resolution after residents criticized it as a potential curb on free speech; the vote was divided but carried.

The Village of Orland Park Board of Trustees adopted a resolution titled “Declaration of Civility in Orland Park,” directing that a signed copy be displayed prominently in village hall.

Supporters, including Trustee Michael Lawler who moved adoption, said the resolution is intended to guide respectful conduct by officials and the public. “This has absolutely nothing to do with suppressing speech,” Mayor James Dodge said before the vote.

Public comment included strong objections. Richard Bonavir told the board the measure risked privileging “civil” speech over constitutionally protected but “uncivil” speech, and urged the board to instead adopt a resolution emphasizing free-speech protections. Several residents said they feared the pledge could be used to chill dissent.

Trustees debated the language and the record shows concern about interpretation and optics. Trustee Katzenas said interpretations of civility can vary and cautioned against a plaque that might appear performative; Trustee Leafblad voiced concerns about civil conduct while also noting the pledge might be unnecessary.

On a roll-call vote the resolution passed with a majority: Trustee Lawler—Aye; Trustee Lawrence—Aye; Trustee Katsenas—No; Trustee Malani—Aye; Trustee Leafblad—Aye; Mayor James Dodge—Aye. Trustee Healy was not present.

The village attorney clarified the document’s title and scope during the meeting. The board did not adopt enforcement mechanisms tied to the pledge; supporters described it as a statement of expectations for conduct rather than a codified penalty.