Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Communications Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District to standardize teacher–family messaging with Apigee "Rooms" app; board to consider administrative regulation

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District technology and communications staff presented Administrative Regulation 42-45.2, proposing districtwide use of the Apigee "Rooms" application for classroom teacher–family messaging beginning next school year.

District technology and communications staff presented Administrative Regulation 42-45.2, proposing districtwide use of the Apigee "Rooms" application for classroom teacher–family messaging beginning next school year.

Staff said the app is similar to Remind or ClassDojo but offers automated roster population (drawing data from Infinite Campus), district-controlled record retention and vendor contracts that address data protection and accessibility (ADA) requirements. The presenter said the district has been using multiple third-party communication apps inconsistently and the new approach centralizes communications and provides district visibility into classroom messages.

"One of the benefits to Rooms is teachers spend a considerable amount of time building their class lists; moving forward using this app, it’s going to be automated for teachers," the presenter said. "Utilizing this software will have complete visibility into all the communication going out to parents." (Tim Peltz, IT/communications staff.)

Board members and staff asked detailed questions about rollout, training, scope and legal implications. Staff said the automated roster feed will be available after an Infinite Campus rollover (first week of August), teachers will receive multiple training options (videos, in-person sessions and individualized support), and the district plans to phase communications so teachers and families transition to a single platform next fall.

Several board members and teachers raised concerns and requested clarifications: whether non-classroom staff (counselors, psychologists, administrators) should be covered; how the district will handle parents or guardians who do not use smartphones (staff said notifications can be pushed to email); whether open-records requests and student-privacy safeguards were clearly communicated to parents and staff; and whether the district had sufficiently sought staff input.

Board members and the presenter discussed ADA compliance and record retention as reasons for adopting a district-controlled solution; staff said third-party free services (for example, ClassDojo) may lack clear ADA compliance and district control of records. Cost for Rooms was presented as $7,500 per year.

The administrative regulation was placed on the board's business-meeting agenda for approval in two weeks; staff said they would refine reg language (including coverage for other staff groups) and continue outreach and training.