Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House concurs on 'Summer Willis Act' to clarify consent in sexual‑assault law

May 30, 2025 | Legislative, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House concurs on 'Summer Willis Act' to clarify consent in sexual‑assault law
The Texas House voted to concur with Senate amendments to House Bill 30 73, known as the Summer Willis Act, a criminal‑law change the sponsor described as clarifying when sexual assault is ‘‘without consent’’ and giving prosecutors additional statutory tools to pursue certain cases.

The act matters because it changes statutory definitions used in prosecutions, clarifying that an assault is without consent where the actor knew the other person was unconscious or physically unable to resist, where the actor knew the other person was unaware the assault was occurring, or where the person was intoxicated or impaired to the extent of being incapable of consenting, according to the sponsor’s floor explanation.

Representative Howard, the bill sponsor, said the bill is the final recommendation of the sexual‑assault survivors task force and argued the changes would improve prosecution rates. ‘‘After today, prosecutors will have the tools they need to put rapists behind bars,’’ Howard said on the floor. She described the amendments as cleaning up statutory language so prosecutions better reflect survivors’ experiences.

Representative Wu asked Howard how long the effort had been underway and whether other states had enacted similar reforms; Howard replied she had worked on the measure for ‘‘three or four sessions’’ and that some other states had adopted comparable language. Lawmakers on the floor cited low reporting and prosecution rates as background for the change; Howard referenced statistics showing a small fraction of assaults reach prosecution under prior law.

The House recorded 135 ayes and 2 nays on concurrence with Senate amendments. Representative Howard moved the concurrence and final passage as the sponsor.

The bill sponsor and others emphasized the legislative intent to give law enforcement and prosecutors clearer statutory definitions; members supporting the measure framed it as aligning Texas law with survivor‑centered practices. During floor debate House members thanked senators and the governor’s office for collaboration on the final language.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI