Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bylaws Remote Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Design Review Committee approves bylaw changes clarifying remote participation, quorum
Summary
Deputy County Attorney Alexandra Spalding reviewed proposed bylaw amendments tied to Virginia Code changes; the committee approved the amendments after discussion clarifying when remote participation counts toward quorum and who may authorize it.
The Goochland County Design Review Committee approved amendments to its bylaws clarifying remote participation and quorum rules during its annual meeting after a review by Deputy County Attorney Alexandra Spalding.
Spalding told the committee the proposed changes reflect updates in the Virginia Code and revisions to the Board of Supervisors’ and Planning Commission’s bylaws. She reviewed the remote-participation provisions and explained the committee’s specific constraints as a three-member body.
Spalding said that under current rules a member participating electronically can count toward quorum only if the absence meets specific conditions in the Virginia Code, such as being a person with a disability or a caregiver. She told members, “The chair can actually make the decision and then the other 2 members can appeal the Chair's decision if they wish to.” She also noted that a personal matter generally does not meet the statutory definition that allows electronic participation to count toward quorum and that small bodies face different limitations than larger boards.
Committee members asked whether a member who is absent for a personal matter could participate remotely without a special vote; Spalding said the bylaws require notice and that, under the committee’s rules, the chair may allow participation with the option for other members to appeal. She also recalled a prior meeting in which the committee used a special motion to allow one member to participate remotely.
After discussion, a committee member moved to approve the amendments to the bylaws; another member seconded the motion and members voted “Aye.” The motion carried and the amended bylaws were adopted.
The amendments were presented as part of the committee’s annual review of governance documents; members said they expect to rely on alternates or moving meeting dates to avoid quorum problems in the future.
