Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Athletic Fields Wetlands topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wetland determination pauses proposed Brush Field double-field; committee weighing redesign or Army Corps review
Summary
The School Committee received an update on the Brush Field project after the Conservation Commission deemed portions of the back property to be wetlands and flagged a riverfront buffer area, blocking the committee—s initial double-field design.
The School Committee received an update on the Brush Field project after the Conservation Commission deemed portions of the back property to be wetlands and flagged a riverfront buffer area.
Bob (district staff) and committee member Brooks briefed the committee about the conservation finding and its effect on the double-field plan the field subcommittee had proposed.
"As it currently stands, with this deemed wetlands and this presentation there is not a path for us to move forward with conservation in Burlington," a district staff member said, describing Conservation—s response and the potential need to seek a review by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Staff showed alternative, smaller footprints that avoid the newly delineated wet areas by reconfiguring fields and shifting accessible routes and seating. The alternatives reduce the maximum number of full-size fields in order to respect buffer zones and create usable practice space.
Committee members discussed next steps, including whether to pursue an Army Corps review to contest the wetland delineation (staff warned the Corps—s opinion might not supersede local conservation authority), and what repair or mitigation would be required if the district attempted pipe repairs that staff said could be contributing to standing-water conditions.
The committee noted that separate Town Meeting funding already approved for the Varsity field and track (front-of-campus resurfacing) remains available; staff said that resurfacing project can proceed independently while the Brush Field options are refined.
Staff recommended bringing engineering cost estimates and a clearer schedule back to the committee before choosing a path that could affect project budget and timing. Members also asked the district to coordinate with Park & Recreation about municipal field priorities (Marvin and Roddie were cited as higher-priority recreation projects) and on whether the town could provide alternate softball/field locations.
No binding vote was taken; the field subcommittee will meet again and return to the full committee with refined designs, cost estimates and a recommendation on whether to seek outside federal review or pursue a narrower configuration that stays outside the conservation buffers.
