Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Capital committee simplifies project-prioritization rubric, drops preweighting step
Summary
Members agreed to remove the preweighting column from the capital prioritization form, require each line item to be scored on the same scale, and test the simplified approach in the Plum (Plumb) system before full rollout.
The committee overseeing Nantucket's capital project prioritization agreed to simplify its scoring rubric, remove a preweighting column and ask members to rate each criterion on the same scale, members said during a virtual meeting.
The change came after debate over wording and whether some line items produced binary answers rather than gradated scores. Committee member John said, "If it's imminent, it it's gonna be done," explaining why he had changed the label from "imminent issue" to "serious issue." The group also approved rewording items such as "employee count" to "staff count" and replacing the single word "redundancy" with "create redundancy/overlap" to clarify intent.
Committee members said the previous process — which asked each member to distribute percentage weights across categories before scoring items — had confused newer participants and sometimes skewed results. "I like the simplicity," Committee member Howard said, describing the proposed change to…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

