Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council amends proposed engine-brake ban language after resident complaint, moves ordinance forward

3616742 · May 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council considered Ordinance No. 1067 to prohibit engine compression brakes within the Nevada city limits. Members amended the draft to remove references to 'air brakes' after questions about definitions and terminology.

The Nevada City Council discussed Ordinance No. 1067, which would amend chapter 62 of the city code to prohibit the use of engine compression brakes within city limits, and amended the draft to remove the term "air brakes" after council members questioned the definition.

A council member noted a recent citizen contact and said the measure responds to resident complaints about noise. During discussion, some council members and staff debated the ordinance’s wording: one member asked whether the term "air brakes" was defined in the ordinance and whether including it was necessary.

A staff member who reviewed other cities’ ordinances said he had intentionally used the phrase "engine compression air brakes" after comparing several ordinances and wanted to cover multiple terms to avoid confusion during enforcement. After council members pointed out that "air brakes" is not equivalent to engine compression brakes and that including "air brakes" could unintentionally ban common commercial braking systems, the proposer amended the motion to remove the phrase.

The council amended the motion and a second was recorded. The transcript shows the council debated the cleaner wording and agreed to proceed with the amended language; however, the record does not show the final vote outcome during the excerpt provided.

Council and staff also discussed the need to post signs at city limits and determine sign placement and procurement. Staff said they do not currently have the signs and will order them and determine the best placement around city limits if the ordinance is adopted.