Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee hears options to retroactively validate 'heavy cut' forestry rule after publication lapse

May 16, 2025 | Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules/LCAR, Joint, Committees, Legislative , Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears options to retroactively validate 'heavy cut' forestry rule after publication lapse
Committee staff told the Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules on May 15 that the Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation has been administering a "heavy cut" rule adopted as an emergency rule in 1997 but that the rule may not have been published in the Vermont code of administrative rules as required by a 2016 statutory amendment that repealed rules not published by July 2018.

Staff said the heavy cut rule, which references U.S. Department of Agriculture silvicultural standards, governs situations where a timber harvest leaves a residual stock below a specified "C-line" and applies on parcels over 40 acres; it requires notice to and authorization from the department and includes an application form and USDA standards incorporated by reference. Agency representatives have been issuing authorizations under the rule since 2018 but, according to staff, did not publish the rule in the code. The department has not based enforcement actions on the rule itself but has used the underlying statute for enforcement.

Committee staff said two remedial options are available: (1) add retroactive validating language in pending legislation to declare the rule never repealed and to require publication within a year, preserving authorizations issued since 2018; or (2) have the agency formally adopt or re-adopt the rule and publish it. Staff reported drafters had proposed retroactive language and that three bills in the Senate had been approached about including it, but the committee was told the timing late in the legislative session makes passage uncertain.

Because the rule was originally adopted as an emergency rule in 1997 and remained unamended, staff said that historical framing contributed to the confusion when the 2016 "repeal by operation of law" provision took effect in 2018.

No committee action or vote was recorded on the heavy cut rule during the meeting. Staff indicated the matter could return to the committee depending on whether legislative language is adopted or the agency pursues formal rule publishing.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee