Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates animal‑shelter costs and outside contracts as shelter operating expenses rise
Summary
Council and staff reviewed animal‑shelter operating costs and intercity contracts after staff said shelter caseloads (40–50 animals/month) and adoption work have driven costs; staff said contracts bring some offsetting revenue but warned Selma must be able to care for its own animals before contracting for others.
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff told the council on May 28 that Selma’s animal‑services operating costs have increased as the shelter handles a higher monthly intake—about 40–50 animals per month—and expanded efforts to find rescues and adoptions. The police chief and budget presenters said that those volumes and the labor involved (animal care, transport, rescue coordination and behavioral assessment) are the main drivers of the shelter’s rising costs.
The department reported an animal‑services proposed budget that includes salaries, operational overhead and a projected offset of roughly $78,000 from city contracts if those agreements continue. Staff said they have increased what outside cities were being charged to better cover the cost of care and transport.
Council concern centered on whether Selma should continue taking animals from other cities (Kingsburg, Fowler) while local shelter demand remains high. Councilmembers asked for copies of the contracts and asked staff to evaluate whether the revenue is worth the added costs and whether the shelter can meet Selma’s needs first. The chief said the city has authority to continue or discontinue intercity agreements and that doing so will require council direction.
Council also discussed staffing and facilities: the shelter has five full‑time staff, one full‑time animal‑control officer, and one part‑time officer; staff said some temporary positions had been reduced elsewhere in the budget to avoid a net increase. The chief and councilmembers discussed replacing the leased transport van with a used vehicle outfitted with kennels and climate control to improve animal transport conditions.
What’s next: staff will provide the full contracts for Kingsburg and Fowler, bring back a financial analysis of the shelter’s cost‑revenue dynamics, and discuss possible changes to the shelter staffing model and contract terms.

