Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members urge streamlined property-tax exemptions to speed affordable housing; Turner Center proposals cited
Summary
Board members discussed ways the Board of Equalization could help streamline property-tax exemptions to incentivize affordable housing construction and preservation, citing a Turner Center brief and the governor’s proposed housing agency reorganization as potential opportunities.
Board members on May 28 discussed strategies to use property-tax exemptions and administrative changes to accelerate affordable housing production and preservation in California.
Member Amber Vasquez introduced the item and cited a Turner Center Housing Innovation brief: "A 4 month delay can add almost $20,000 per unit in cost," she said, summarizing the brief’s claim and urging the board to consider streamlining procedures where the board and county assessors play a role. Vasquez said the state needs a more coordinated approach and referenced the governor’s proposal to reorganize housing-related state agencies into a one-stop California Housing and Homelessness Agency.
Vice Chair Lieber supported getting additional detail and suggested inviting the Turner Center for a presentation and exploring limited demonstration projects targeted at low-income and extremely low-income housing. "Potentially getting a presentation from the Turner Center ... could lead ... to a demonstration project or a series of demonstration projects," Lieber said.
Member Schaeffer warned of practical enforcement challenges when exemptions rely on tenant income verification and long-term restrictions. He described difficulties collecting reliable tenant income data and questioned whether local governments have capacity to police long-term compliance: "I think if we took a look at it 5 or 10 years later, we're gonna find there's an awful lot of non enforcement," he said, adding concerns about transfer and resale enforcement and the administrative burden on counties.
Members agreed the board’s role—administering the welfare (property-tax) exemption and working with county assessors—makes it appropriate to study how exemptions and procedures could better support new construction and preservation of deeply affordable units. Controller Cohen and others noted that housing affordability and insurance availability are linked to project feasibility; a public commenter asked the board to coordinate with the insurance commissioner on affordability and underwriting for affordable housing projects.
Ending: Members asked staff to continue tracking proposals, invited further analysis and potential external presentations (for example, from the Turner Center), and signaled interest in exploring demonstration projects and regulatory streamlining to reduce time and cost barriers to affordable housing.
