Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the City Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City council reviews managerevaluation, no formal personnel action taken

3611740 · May 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members discussed the city manager's annual evaluation and expressed overall approval of performance during a public meeting May 27; no formal vote or appointment was recorded on the evaluation in the transcript.

The City of Perry City Council discussed the annual evaluation of the city manager during its May 27 meeting, with members offering generally positive feedback but taking no recorded formal personnel action on the evaluation.

Council members said the manager's performance was strong overall and noted areas of communication and meeting participation. Several council members complimented the manager's work; no motion with a documented final vote on the evaluation appears in the meeting record provided.

The discussion took place during agenda item 6(a), labeled "City manager evaluation." Council members spoke about the document and offered remarks about meeting conduct and performance. The transcript records comments that the evaluation was "pretty good" and that the manager was "doing a great job all the way around," but it does not show a completed formal vote on any specific personnel action.

Because the transcript does not include a recorded motion or vote to approve, certify, or amend the evaluation, the council's discussion should be treated as discussion only in this meeting. Any subsequent personnel actions, such as formal adoption of the evaluation, performance-related pay changes, or contract amendments, would require either a recorded motion and vote or a later meeting with corresponding minutes.

Council members indicated they would continue routine oversight and follow established personnel processes for future action if needed. No timeline for follow-up or assignment to staff was recorded in the provided transcript.