Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Funding Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent outlines special‑education costs, reimbursement tiers; school board seeks more staff for early intervention
Summary
Superintendent Zach (Dr. McLaughlin) told councilors the district projects some high per‑student special‑education costs that trigger state reimbursement and urged investment in early intervention and mental‑health supports; the school board seeks five paraeducators while the manager’s budget contains two.
Superintendent Zach (Dr. McLaughlin) explained special‑education cost drivers to the council on May 28 and urged investments in early prevention and district‑wide interventions to reduce out‑of‑district placements and long‑term costs.
The superintendent summarized how state reimbursements phase in: once a student’s out‑of‑district cost exceeds $75,000, the state reimburses at 80% of those excess costs, and at roughly $215,000 (about ten times average student cost) the state covers all additional costs beyond that point, he said. The district noted the practical problem that those reimbursements often arrive in the following fiscal year, complicating annual budgeting.
What the school asked for: the school board’s recommended request includes investments in special‑education staff, additional mental‑health resources and several paraprofessionals. Superintendent Zach said the school board’s prioritized list would start with positions tied to keeping students in district and expanding early‑grade interventions.
Funding and SAU 50 tuition: district officials explained that SAU 50 tuition and cost allocations are governed by the area agreement; the superintendent said clarifications were last made in February 2009 and that sending districts (for example Rye) have been discussing reopening aspects of the agreement in recent years. The superintendent also said some costs (for example, equipment dedicated to one sending district’s student) are excluded from the pooled tuition calculation, and otherwise costs are rolled into the combined high‑school budget and divided across the sending communities by per‑pupil calculation.
Numbers and next steps: the manager’s package includes two paraeducator positions while the school board requested five; school leaders labeled the remaining three as anticipatory positions tied to projected student needs. Councilors asked the superintendent and staff to provide counts and methodology for converting IEP‑driven hours into FTE equivalents; staff agreed to try to produce a two‑year snapshot and current‑year detail before the final vote.
Ending: No formal budget change was made on May 28. Councilors and the school department agreed to continue discussion and to reconcile line‑item control questions under the charter as they approach a June 9 vote.
