Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Missoula panel debates legitimacy and tactics of protest, referencing Abbie Hoffman, COINTELPRO and intelligence agencies
Summary
Panelists at a Missoula discussion on a film about 1960s protest politics debated when protest is legitimate, praised theatrical tactics as attention-getting, and disagreed over Abbie Hoffman's death and the role of intelligence agencies such as the CIA and COINTELPRO.
Panelists at a Missoula screening and discussion of a film about 1960s protest politics debated when and how public protest is legitimate, whether theatrical tactics can be effective, and the historical role of intelligence programs in suppressing dissent.
"Part of the reason Abbie Hoffman is so interesting, it seems to me, is that he did not enact the the power. He was not somber," said a panelist who identified himself as a scholar, describing Hoffman’s theatrical approach to protest. The same panelist said strategic and tactical questions about protest "are questions any protester has to deal with for himself or herself," and declined to set a universal rule for legitimacy.
Panelists described a common pattern: organizers often try working within political institutions first, and resort to street protest when they conclude the system "doesn't listen." One panelist…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

