Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stadium Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Treasury says statute gives high-level safeguards as lawmakers seek detail on stadium financing
Summary
During an informational meeting about Senate Bill 110A, legislators pressed the Oregon State Treasury on financial oversight and asked whether more specific due-diligence language should be placed in statute rather than left to agency practice.
Lawmakers used an informational meeting May 29 to press the Oregon State Treasury for assurances about financial oversight related to Senate Bill 110A, a bill that would enable future transactions tied to a proposed stadium authority.
Representative Marsh said the statute gives the treasurer authority to execute agreements but lacks an explicit instruction requiring a full technical due-diligence review of financing terms. "What I don't see in the bill ... is an instruction around due diligence," Marsh said, asking whether the bill should require analysis of "terms, rates, amortization structures, call provisions, flow of funds, lien priority, and other, technical expertise and financial oversight."
Jaime Alvarez, director of debt management for Oregon State Treasury, responded that Treasury relies on existing statute — specifically the provision cited during testimony as subsection n of ORS 184.404 — to "protect the interests of the state" and that reviewing terms of financial instruments is routine work for the agency. "When it does come time for us to make that review, we will make sure that the state is in a sound position," Alvarez said, adding the agency will raise objections if warranted.
Committee members pressed for language in the bill that would require the kinds of financial analysis Marsh described. Treasury officials cautioned that prescribing detailed requirements in statute may be difficult because the specific financial instruments have not yet been identified; Alvarez said the bill provides a higher-level framework and that some protections are already included in current law.
Chair Nathanson framed the discussion as part of the legislature’s fiduciary responsibility to ensure agreements are properly reviewed before authority is handed off to administrative agencies. "This is our last opportunity to understand I's are dotted, T's are crossed," Nathanson said, describing the committee's role in assessing whether the legislature is ready to hand authority to the Department of Administrative Services and the State Treasurer.
The informational meeting concluded with committee members noting documents from Treasury had been posted to the bill record; no votes or formal committee action occurred during the session.
