Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Hughes seeks permanent TEOSA review panel; Legislature debates membership and timing of recommendations
Summary
LB303 would create a school finance reform commission to review the TEOSA funding formula and deliver annual recommendations. The floor amendment AM15‑93 narrows legislative membership to committee chairs (or designees) plus one at‑large legislator; a separate floor amendment to strike lines failed.
Senator Kelly Hughes opened floor debate on LB303 and offered AM15‑93 to adjust the bill’s legislative representation. LB303 establishes a school‑finance reform commission to examine the state’s school funding formula (TEOSA) and provide recommendations to the Legislature.
AM15‑93 revises the bill’s legislative appointments so that the three legislative seats on the commission are the chair of the Education Committee (or a designee), the chair of the Revenue Committee (or a designee), and one at‑large legislator. The amendment also retains a party‑balance limit so no more than two commission members may belong to the same political party. Hughes said the commission would produce annual recommendations and noted the group would be non‑voting for the three legislative members to avoid separation‑of‑powers concerns.
Supporters framed the commission as a long‑term technical resource to give the Legislature regular, expert review of TEOSA and valuation trends before each session. "If this body would have been receiving annual reports from the commission... things might not have gotten so skewed," Hughes said, noting past valuation shifts that affected equalization aid.
Floor amendment rejected: Senator Michaela Kavanaugh offered FA322 (floor amendment 3‑22) to strike lines 12–17 of the bill; the body rejected FA322 on a roll call (2 ayes, 34 nays). Kavanaugh said she remained supportive of LB303’s current iteration but lamented that an earlier draft of LB303 had been proposed as a vehicle for larger property‑tax relief ideas; she said the body had missed an opportunity but would continue to use procedural tools to press matters she supports.
Why it matters: LB303 would create a standing expert body to monitor school funding mechanics (enrollment weights, valuations, sparsity, poverty adjustments and similar technical levers) and return recommendations to the Legislature before each session. Supporters emphasized that recurring turnover in the Legislature and the complexity of TEOSA make a consistent technical advisory body useful; opponents and some members sought changes to appointment rules so the commission would be broadly representative and not substitute for legislative decision making.
Ending: Debate continued on the floor and the bill had pending amendments and motions at recess; FA322 was defeated and AM15‑93 remained in the record as the membership compromise.
