Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Conservation 103 Guild topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community Preservation Committee: 103 Guild Road purchase delayed after title issues cut parcel size
Summary
An update to the Framingham Community Preservation Committee revealed that the planned purchase of 103 Guild Road has been reduced from 39 to 27 acres because of unclear title in adjoining towns; the city's 11-acre portion is clear and appraisals and grants shape next steps.
Sarkis Sarkisian, a presenter to the Community Preservation Committee, told members Monday that a planned preservation purchase at 103 Guild Road is facing delays after surveys showed unclear ownership of portions of the site.
The committee was told the overall site was expected to be 39 acres but that recent surveys show the parcel the city believed it would buy is 27 acres; the Framingham portion alone is 11 acres and is "clean," Sarkis Sarkisian said. The discrepancy affects connectivity to the Upper Charles Trail because the Ashland-held portion contains the dike that links to Route 126.
Why it matters: the Ashland portion contains the dike that provides a key link in the Upper Charles Trail system and could affect the project's recreational and trail-conservation value for neighboring towns.
Sarkis said the city's due diligence work, paid for with a federal EPA grant, included Phase I and II environmental reports that have reduced concerns about contamination and may have increased the property's marketability. "It's hard to believe it's been 2 years, and we haven't closed yet," Sarkis said. He said the environmental work and the survey work were costly but funded by grants rather than the city's own funds.
Committee members asked about price and appraisal rules. The committee's 2023 approval capped Framingham's contribution at the lesser of $250,000 or the appraised value for the Framingham portion; the existing appraisal places the Framingham portion at $220,000. Sarkis said the property owner had sought $475,000 for the combined parcel but that the state was prepared to contribute about $215,000 through an MVP grant.
Committee discussion focused on next steps rather than an immediate vote. Options discussed included closing only on the 11-acre Framingham parcel and having the owner transfer or gift the Ashland portion to the town of Ashland, or asking for an updated appraisal. Sarkis said an updated appraisal for the whole parcel would likely cost "about 4 to $5,000." He told the committee he was not asking for new funds that night but said he might return with a request for an appraisal focused on the Framingham portion.
Committee members also noted the title discrepancy between the town of Ashland's counsel, which believes the owner has paid taxes and therefore owns the land, and the surveyor's findings. That conflict is likely to require further research and could delay a full closing. Sarkis said the town of Ashland has done its own title work and is pursuing its piece of the project.
Sarkis and other members emphasized that a conservation restriction will be required on land the committee helps to buy and that a regional land trust (referred to by participants as SVT) could hold that restriction so the city could close on its piece even while the other ownership questions are resolved. The committee agreed to stay informed and asked Sarkis to return with updates, including whether an updated appraisal would be sought and, if so, whether it would be limited to the Framingham parcel.
Next steps: the presenter said he would continue due diligence, may commission an updated appraisal, and will report back to the committee with timing and specific funding requests if needed.
