Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables parking ordinance after resident objects to 230-foot no-parking proposal
Summary
A resident opposed Ordinance 25-35, which would amend Chapter 406 (traffic control map) to change no‑parking distances; council voted to send the measure back to the legislative committee for further review.
Mark Zander, a Vermilion resident, asked the council not to adopt Ordinance 25-35, which would change the city’s traffic-control map and create extended no-parking distances near a driveway on his block.
Zander said the proposed change would remove longstanding parking near his home and that the new measurement (described in the proposal as about 230 feet) was excessive for the location. "I've lived in the house for 25 years," Zander said, arguing the intersection had not been a safety problem in that time and questioning why the city would extend the no‑parking zone so far from the stop sign.
Council members discussed the origin of the 230-foot figure and said it derived from a previous council member’s proposal responding to a citizen complaint; one council member moved to table the ordinance and send it back to the legislative committee to give staff and neighbors more time to review sight lines and options. The motion to table passed on roll call (yes: Drew Worley [Ward 3], Pat West [Ward 1], Jeff Lucas [Ward 4], others; no: Worley voted no on earlier motions and the final tally recorded one or two dissenting votes). The item will be considered by the legislative committee at its next meeting.
No changes to on-street parking were enacted at the meeting; the council recorded the motion to table and scheduled further consideration in committee.
