Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Streets And Sidewalks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lindsay staff urge council to prioritize Westwood, downtown sidewalks as street-funding shortfall tightens
Summary
Staff presented a street-and-sidewalk prioritization plan, highlighting Westwood and downtown sidewalk rehabilitation; staff warned the street fund lost a large refuse contribution and urged council to set budget targets and priorities so the city can apply Measure R and other grant funds efficiently.
City public works and planning staff on May 27 asked the Lindsay City Council to set priorities and budget targets for street rehabilitation and sidewalk repair, urging the council to consider Westwood, central corridors near Jefferson School and downtown sidewalk rehabilitation among the highest priorities.
Staff said the city’s 200-series street fund had a reported cash balance and projected revenue and described a recent reduction in the fund’s ongoing revenue because refuse-related allocations to the street fund have fallen sharply. Staff recommended council consider (1) selecting a rehab package (staff suggested Package 2 as the next focus), (2) adopting a budget split among maintenance, seal/binder treatments and larger rehabilitation, and (3) compiling a prioritized list of specific streets to speed grant applications and bidding when construction dollars are available.
Nut graf: City staff described an overview of multiple restricted revenue sources — state gas tax lines, Measure R allocations administered by TCAG, and the city’s street enterprise fund — and said the combination of limited local revenue and project-specific grant opportunities makes it important for council to declare priorities now so staff can prepare grant applications and update engineer estimates.
Staff walked council through a pavement-management framework (maintenance seals, chip seal/binder layers, and full rehabilitation) and recommended setting about 15% of a streets budget for seal maintenance, a larger share for thicker treatments and a majority for rehabilitation when major projects are possible. Staff also outlined Measure R categories and said Measure R category 2 has $3 million used to buy the transit center site while a valley corridor state grant yields roughly $6.5 million for that transit project; staff reiterated those funds are separate from street budgets but are part of the overall transportation funding picture.
Staff presented a separate sidewalk rehabilitation proposal focused on downtown and school drop-off areas. The downtown rehab list identified roughly 740 square feet of sidewalk repairs in about 20 locations (staff used an estimated cost of $25 per square foot in a preliminary in-house estimate), and staff recommended pursuing active-transportation and pedestrian-safety grants and updating crosswalk treatments to comply with the new state visibility/marking guidance described in the staff presentation.
Ending: Council did not take a budget vote but directed staff to update engineer estimates and return with package-level costings and grant-application plans; staff said design- and procurement-level work typically requires roughly a year from direction to contract award.
