Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Handbook Dress Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board and administrators debate districtwide dress-code language, enforcement and administrator discretion
Summary
Board members questioned proposed districtwide dress-code wording (terms such as 'decency' and 'torso'), enforcement practices and how teacher referrals and on-the-spot corrections would be handled across buildings.
Elmwood Park CUSD 401 trustees examined proposed districtwide dress-code language at their May 20 meeting and asked district administrators to clarify ambiguous terms and enforcement procedures.
A board member asked why the handbook’s overarching language used the word "decency," noting it can be interpreted differently. The presenter replied that the wording was copied from existing board policy.
Board members probed other terms in the draft, including a line that requires "coverage of the chest, torso" and a provision stating "straps over the shoulders" and that undergarments must be covered. "Torso is a really broad term," a board member said, asking whether the draft intended to address midriff exposure specifically. Administrators said the term "torso" was chosen to avoid singling out a gender and to give administrators a broad standard to apply.
Board members also asked how enforcement would work. Administrators described an on-the-spot corrective-action option for teachers, supplemented by a referral recorded through PowerSchool when a classroom intervention is needed or a student is noncompliant. "If a teacher is having an issue with the student, they're gonna go into our PowerSchool system, they're gonna fill out what's called a referral," a presenter said. Staff said referrals allow the district to maintain a record to track repeat violations.
A board member asked how the district handles repeated dress-code violations; staff said repeated referrals would lead to layered interventions similar to other behavioral referrals. Administrators emphasized building-level discretion and sensitivity so staff — for example, of different genders — do not feel uncomfortable enforcing the policy.
Board members requested consistent formatting across the four school handbooks and asked for future iterations to align calendar, bell schedule and grading-policy presentations. Administrators said the handbooks now live on the district website and they are working toward a consistent format and translation access.
The discussion was part of the meeting’s first-reading review of handbook updates; the item remained in the discussion phase pending any revisions by staff and the board.
