Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs changes to public‑comment process, considers online submission and time limits
Summary
Board members debated whether emailed public comments should continue to be read aloud at meetings, whether a website submission platform should be posted, and whether time limits for reading letters and public‑comment periods should be enforced.
Ferguson‑Florissant School District board members discussed updating the district’s public‑comment process during the May 28 meeting, focusing on whether emailed comments should be read aloud, how to preserve commenters’ statements, and whether to impose time limits.
Board members described three principal goals: keep public comment accessible in multiple formats, create a record or repository on the district website for emailed comments, and limit meeting time spent on comments so meetings run on schedule. Director Doctor Graves (board) asked whether emailed comments “necessarily have to be read during public comment” and suggested a website repository where submitted comments and administration responses could be posted.
Several board members supported a plan that the board’s small working group will draft: create a submission platform with a screening step before public posting, maintain a limit on how long written submissions are read at the meeting (the board discussed 15–30 minutes), and set a time limit for in‑person public commenters (examples given were 2–3 minutes per speaker). Speakers suggested that administration or a designated staff member be accountable to process and route incoming comments and feedback so authors receive follow‑up.
Board member Vivian Mansory volunteered to lead a small group to develop specific recommendations, and members discussed whether the assistant secretary or another staff person should receive and track submissions. The board instructed the group to return proposed procedures at a later meeting.
The discussion clarified that the district previously read mailed comments aloud and used written submissions more broadly during COVID‑era adaptations; the board said it wants to maintain accessibility for people who cannot attend meetings while ensuring public meetings do not stretch excessively. No formal policy changes were adopted May 28.
Administrators were directed to consider existing platforms (district Gmail, meeting comments, and prior systems such as Let’s Talk) when drafting the new process and to propose guidance on screening, posting and reply timelines.
