Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Practice And Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Designers, contractors and nonprofits outline practical barriers and solutions for deconstruction: summit, case study and hackathons
Summary
Practitioners and nonprofit groups on May 13 told a MassDEP webinar that deconstruction and building-material reuse are growing but face persistent operational barriers — storage, mismatched markets and labor costs — even as local pilots and collaborative design efforts show practical ways forward.
Practitioners and nonprofit groups on May 13 told Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection webinar attendees that deconstruction and building-material reuse are gaining traction but face persistent operational barriers, especially storage, market development and labor.
Kristin Fritsch of Elkus Manfredi Architects summarized a four-hour reuse workshop held alongside Greenbuild that convened roughly 42 designers, contractors, developers and sustainability leads to identify visions, barriers and product feasibility for reuse. Participants ranked commonly salvaged products (furniture and interior items were ranked most feasible) and discussed incentives and policies needed to scale reuse beyond residential projects to commercial work.
Turner Construction project manager David Polanco presented a suburban 4,000-square-foot fit-out case study that reused demountable doors and frames, furniture, AV equipment and carpet tile (the latter through a manufacturer take-back program). Polanco described tradeoffs and lessons learned: “The big challenge that we faced, was storage,” he said; other issues included labor costs for salvaging higher-skill items (for example, existing wood ceilings), warranty limitations on salvaged HVAC units and the need to involve owners early to resolve fit and finish issues.
Andrew Thompson of Boston Building Resources described the nonprofit’s residential deconstruction work in Roxbury, where volunteers and staff salvage cabinets, appliances, doors and flooring for resale in a reuse center that prioritizes affordability and income-qualified discounts. Thompson said storage and market development are limiting factors; his organization focuses on materials it can quickly sell or repurpose and supplements direct projects with consulting to help builders understand what materials are worth salvaging.
Barbara Botchello of the Sustainable Performance Institute described “decon hackathons,” collaborative sessions that bring designers, contractors, owners and policy stakeholders together to rework standard assembly details so they are demountable and easier to reuse. Botchello said the goal is a public library of deconstruction-friendly standard details to reduce duplicated work and enable manufacturers and designers to prioritize circular product strategies.
Speakers repeatedly emphasized common barriers: limited on-site space and centralized storage for salvaged goods, unclear markets for certain materials (notably flooring and some finishes), labor and cost tradeoffs for salvaging higher-value assemblies, and the lack of standardized design details that facilitate future disassembly.
Panelists also offered several practical strategies: early owner buy-in and coordination (Polanco), using open-space 3-D capture tools to share existing conditions with reuse partners (Polanco), prioritizing back-of-house and non-customer-facing areas for reuse (Polanco), volunteer-supported deconstruction and resale models (Thompson), and hackathoneering to standardize deconstructable assemblies (Botchello).
The session concluded with cross-cutting recommendations for scaling reuse: develop incentives to drive reclaimed-product uptake, create aggregation mechanisms for small-quantity items, identify and support workforce-training pathways tied to steady deconstruction demand, and publish model details and specifications that make assemblies easier to disassemble and remanufacture.
