Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Climate Action Prioritization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carmel climate advisory committee will send six priority initiatives to internal sustainability team
Summary
At its May 27 meeting the Carmel Climate Action Advisory Committee agreed to ask the city's internal sustainability committee to review six previously chosen priority initiatives for feasibility, costs and timelines and to report back.
Carmel 'The Carmel Climate Action Advisory Committee voted informally at its May 27 meeting to send the six priority initiatives it narrowed from a longer plan to the city's internal sustainability committee for assessment of achievability, resource needs and timelines.
The action grew from a briefing the advisory committee received about overlap between the mayor's priorities and the committee's work. Tony, a committee member, said the mayor's office emphasized walkability, bikeability and water conservation and that 'one of their main goals is to increase walkability and bikeability throughout the City Of Carmel.'
Why it matters: the advisory committee was created by city ordinance to keep the 2019 Climate Action Plan moving. Committee members said they face practical limits on staff time and funding and want department-level input before advising the council or mayor on what to prioritize and what resources will be needed.
Committee members described a two-track approach: continue using the advisory role to highlight strategies and public education while asking the internal sustainability committee and department heads to develop concrete action plans. Alexia (Department of Community Services, city staff) proposed taking the six strategies back to the internal sustainability committee and asked that group to 'create a sustainability action plan for those' initiatives, including how long they would take and what resources would be needed.
Discussion at the meeting traced the advisory group's limited capacity: members noted the committee originally narrowed 42 strategies to six, that the city lacks a dedicated sustainability coordinator (staff said one likely would not be funded until 2027 at the earliest), and that some progress has come from work already underway in departments rather than from the committee itself. Ryan (committee member) urged keeping the highest greenhouse-gas-emitting strategies 'education, energy and transportation' as priorities.
Next steps: Alexia and other advisory members will present the six priorities to the internal sustainability committee and request action plans and estimates of costs, staffing and obstacles. The advisory committee will review the internal committee's response at a future meeting and use that information when reporting to city council.
No formal ordinance or budget change was passed at this meeting; the group recorded the assignment to request feasibility plans and to report back to the advisory committee.
