Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant outlines land-use fiscal analysis for Coppell comp plan update
Summary
The city engaged Redundity to produce a fiscal analysis to inform Coppell's comprehensive plan update; consultant identified Coppell as financially strong but potentially vulnerable due to sales-tax reliance and limited developable land.
Coppell — The city has engaged planning firm Redundity to produce a land-use fiscal analysis to feed into the comprehensive plan update, consultant Kevin Shepherd told the council on May 27.
Shepherd, Redundity's founder and CEO, said the analysis will map taxable-value and infrastructure costs by parcel, model revenue per acre under different development patterns and test scenarios that show how lot size, vertical development and sales-tax exposure affect long-term fiscal health. He told the council the project timeline anticipates baseline work finishing in June, a results presentation to council in July and deeper staff-level briefings in August.
Shepherd said Coppell is in a stronger fiscal position than many communities because of its sales-tax base and past policy choices but identified potential vulnerabilities: a large share of revenue is from distribution sales tax (which can be volatile), the city has limited available land to generate additional revenue, and there is a jobs'housing mismatch (the city has more people employed in Coppell than residents who work locally). Shepherd used Cypress Waters as a comparative example, showing it had higher taxable value per acre and lower infrastructure per resident because of a more compact, higher-productivity development pattern.
The analysis will produce maps and tables showing net revenue per acre, revenue and cost implications by land use and zoning, and scenario testing for different housing and development concepts. Shepherd said staff and council will receive parcel-level property-tax results and consolidated sales-tax findings, and that the firm can present community workshops if the council requests public engagement on the fiscal tradeoffs behind land-use choices.
Shepherd urged council to consider the long-term maintenance and replacement costs of infrastructure as part of development and investment decisions. Staff will return with the baseline analysis and proposed development scenarios for council review.
The council did not take formal action; Shepherd's presentation set expectations and a timeline for the fiscal-analysis deliverables that will inform the comp plan update.
