Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dredging And Shoreline Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council grants 30-day deferral on borrow-pit item amid concerns about alternatives and dredge disposal
Summary
Council deferred consideration of a proposed borrow pit connected to the city's dredging program for 30 days while staff prepares more information about alternatives, permitting and disposal impacts; staff warned longer delays could raise dredging costs and program uncertainty.
Council deferred action for 30 days on a planning item that would authorize use of a city site as a borrow pit for dredged material, in part to allow staff to provide additional alternatives and mitigation information.
Speakers at the planning discussion noted the technical and regulatory complexity of creating a new borrow pit. Staff warned that a borrow pit requires mining permits and that options to move dredged material to other locations would also carry permitting timelines and disposal costs. “If you dig a hole, you’ve got to put the dirt somewhere else,” staff said, explaining the scheduling and permitting constraints that affect the city’s dredging program and the SSD (special service district) dredging schedule.
Councilmembers asked for written alternatives analyses and careful review of how any change would affect the city’s overall dredging program and its costs, including impacts for SSD districts and dredging schedules. Staff said 30 days is workable for additional information and that longer deferrals risk disrupting the city’s dredging timeline and increasing program costs.
Council’s direction: defer the item for 30 days (return to council on the stated deferral date) and ask staff to present alternatives, mitigation measures, permit timelines and cost implications for the city and the SSD dredging program.
