Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Addition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BAR approves dormers, egress and restoration work at family-owned 303 Queen Street; staff to refine ridge detail
Summary
The Board approved additions of two dormers, egress changes and window replacements at 303 Queen Street, a family-owned home, with a condition that staff and the architect work out a ridge/dormer detail for the rear elevation
Get email alerts on the Residential Addition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Architectural Review approved an application to add two dormers, an egress window and to replace windows at 303 Queen Street, a house owned by John S. Williams, with the architect and staff to finalize a ridge/dormer detail.
Phyllis Williams spoke for the applicant, explaining the family ownership history of 303 and saying the requested changes would increase headroom and create a bedroom in the attic. She said the project includes two shed dormers at the rear—one at the second floor to improve headroom and an attic dormer to create a bedroom—and wood window replacements in accordance with BAR guidelines.
During staff and board review, commissioners asked about a ridge-beam and how the dormer would tie into the existing ridge and neighboring roofs. Staff and architect Robert Bentley Adams agreed to work with the applicant on a detailed ridge/dormer solution so that the dormer does not appear as an isolated element cut off from party-wall to party-wall.
Public speakers who supported the project included Wayne Fisher, who assisted with the estate sale and preservation of the house’s interior contents, and Scott Corzine, a neighbor at 300 Queen Street, who said the proposal “respects the size and scale of our historic city.” Commissioners voiced support; Commissioner Lyons said the project will “look fantastic when it’s done.”
A motion to approve the applications (BAR 2025-00140 and BAR 2025-00141) passed on a roll-call vote; commissioners asked staff to work with the architect on the ridge/dormer detail prior to permit issuance. The board recorded the vote in favor; the application was approved subject to the staff–architect detailing direction.
