Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cup My Mommas Kitchen topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Operator proposes alcohol sales at My Momma’s Kitchen location on East Little Creek Road; staff recommends approval with conditions
Summary
Applicant for My Momma’s Kitchen seeks a conditional use permit to sell alcoholic beverages on premise at 1872 East Little Creek Road; staff recommended approval subject to conditions, presented hours and occupancy, and noted local letters of support and neighbor concerns about a nearby property.
Planning staff presented a conditional use permit application for My Momma’s Kitchen at 1872 East Little Creek Road to allow on‑premise sale of alcoholic beverages. The site lies on the north side of East Little Creek Road between Hawthorne Drive and Metal Creek Road and is zoned community commercial.
Staff said the operator is relocating from 7943 Shore Drive, where the business operated for 11 years without serving alcohol. For the proposed East Little Creek location, the operator has proposed hours of operation of 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday–Thursday, 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Friday–Saturday, and 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Sunday; proposed alcohol service hours mirror those operating hours. Staff reported the indoor seating occupancy at 88 with a total occupancy of 99 and noted site improvements planned by the applicant, including restriping the parking lot, installing a dumpster enclosure and adding landscaping after opening to generate revenue.
Staff said they received a letter of recommendation from the East Little Creek Business Association and also phone calls and emails from a neighboring property expressing concerns related to a different adjacent establishment rather than the subject property. Staff recommended approval with conditions and noted the applicant might request a one‑hour extension of hours at the public hearing; staff said they would support an hour extension should the applicant request it.
The transcript captures commissioners’ discussion about building improvements and whether landlord obligations could be conditioned; staff answered that those items could be considered on a per‑application basis. The provided transcript does not record a commission vote.
