Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the After School Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Two community groups propose after‑school programs to Maple Heights board; transportation and scheduling unresolved
Summary
Two community groups presented after‑school program proposals during public participation at the Maple Heights Board of Education meeting on May 27; the board did not take action during public comment.
Two community groups presented after‑school program proposals during public participation at the Maple Heights Board of Education meeting on May 27; the board did not take action during public comment.
Monica Smith, representing Friends of the Bridegroom Ministries, told the board the group can offer free after‑school programming for Maple Heights students and described classes ranging from college preparation to healthy cooking and audio recording. “We have a list of after school programs for high school through elementary,” Smith said, and said the ministry can provide background checks and fingerprinting services for students who need them for work or college applications.
Smith said the non‑religious portion of the proposal would include a six‑week college‑prep class for juniors and seniors, alternative‑career curriculum for students not pursuing college, a middle‑school healthy cooking course, and instruction at a Valley View recording studio for students interested in audio technology. Class size was described as roughly 30 students for some offerings, and presenters said sessions could be scheduled once per year initially to test demand.
Mariah Peters described a separate faith‑based program called the Plumb Line Effect, which she said focuses on character development and leadership through teachings of Jesus Christ and would run throughout the 2025–26 school year. Peters said program benefits would include “personal character development and growth, building communication and collaboration skills” and creating a space for students of faith to practice and find community.
Board members asked logistical questions; in particular, transportation to an off‑site recording studio was unresolved. Peters and Smith said transportation and scheduling would need to be worked out with district staff and noted existing funding for the studio program may be available but details were not provided.
No board motion or vote was taken on the proposals during the meeting. Presenters left contact information and asked the district to follow up if administrators wanted to explore facility use, scheduling, or transportation arrangements.
