Wakefield explores state grant and private lease option for electric school buses

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff and an Environmental Sustainability Committee member reported a time‑sensitive opportunity to apply for state funds and a potential lease partnership with Highland Fleets to replace one or two in‑district Class A buses pending grant award and cost analysis.

Wakefield school officials told the committee they are exploring a state grant and a private leasing partner to pilot electric school buses for the district’s in‑house Class A buses.

The Environmental Sustainability Committee (ESC) and district staff met with Highland Fleets, a company the presenters described as an end‑to‑end provider that can help with infrastructure, grid partnerships and the grant application. The district is considering replacing one or two in‑district Class A buses through a grant; the administration emphasized the process is time‑sensitive.

Dr. Lyons and district staff said Highland Fleets will use the district’s fleet and contract data to shape a grant application and provide a cost estimate. The administration will analyze whether the grant would offset purchase and infrastructure costs sufficiently to avoid any negative impact on the regular operating budget; the district said staff would not pursue a program that increases the general‑fund cost of daily operations.

Committee members asked whether the lease would include drivers; presenters clarified the proposal applies to the district’s Class A buses (owned/operated by the district) and not to contracted services that supply drivers through NRT. Highland Fleets was described as a “soup‑to‑nuts” vendor that could shepherd the district through procurement, infrastructure and grant steps if the district chooses to apply.

No formal vote or commitment was made at the meeting; the administration requested permission to proceed with gathering the technical details and grant materials and to return with a cost‑benefit analysis. Committee members noted the timeline for the grant application is short and urged the administration to prioritize the fiscal analysis.