Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elementary Literacy Adoption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Woodstock CUSD 200 staff say elementary literacy program failed; district seeking replacement
Summary
A staff member told the Woodstock CUSD 200 board that the district's elementary literacy program "is not really successful" and that the vendor has stopped producing it, prompting district staff to pursue other providers and consult an expert, Jackie Kelly.
A staff member told the Woodstock CUSD 200 Board of Education that the district’s current elementary literacy program has not met expectations and the vendor has stopped producing the materials, and that district staff have begun meeting with other providers.
The comments, made during a discussion about curriculum adoption, included: “we know our elementary literacy program is not really successful. ... and today, they stopped producing it. So we had to go out and meet someone else,” attributed to a staff member in the meeting transcript. The staff member also referenced consulting Jackie Kelly as an expert in the effort to identify alternatives.
The issue matters because elementary literacy programs shape reading instruction across multiple grades and can require classroom materials, teacher training and implementation timelines. Board members asked for questions and comments on the item, according to the transcript, but no formal adoption vote or motion regarding a replacement program is recorded there.
District staff described the situation as one of replacement and review rather than a completed contract action: they said the existing program had underperformed and the program vendor halted production, which prompted outreach to other vendors. The transcript does not record details such as the vendor’s name, any dollar amounts, proposed replacement products, or a timetable for bringing a recommended program back to the board.
The transcript also notes unrelated brief remarks that graduating seniors were recognized earlier in the spring and that 11 French students participated in a national French exam; those items were presented as informational and not tied to the literacy program discussion.
No formal board motion, vote tally, contract award or timetable for selection appears in the transcript excerpts provided. The staff member’s remarks indicate the district has started meetings with alternative providers and plans additional review; the board’s next steps were not specified in the excerpt.
