Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Addressing 911 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tompkins COG signals consensus to explore countywide 9-1-1 addressing; municipalities cite need to fix legacy numbering

3507599 · May 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members agreed by consensus to ask county staff to explore a countywide addressing system after emergency responders said success would require unanimous municipal buy-in and authority to correct legacy addressing problems.

Representatives at the Tompkins County Council of Governments meeting on May 22 signaled a consensus to pursue further study of a countywide 9-1-1 addressing system, with municipal officials emphasizing the need to resolve duplicate and out-of-sequence address numbering first.

Mark Whitmer relayed that Department of Emergency Response staff described two conditions for a countywide addressing system: "unanimous buy in from the municipalities" and the county’s ability "to fix addressing issues," such as misnumbered or duplicate street names, before implementation.

Council members from several towns said those issues—duplicate names across municipal borders and non-sequential numbering—are widespread. Joel (municipal representative) and others cited examples where correcting local patterns required coordinated renumbering. Joel said addressing problems on Deputron Hollow Road provided a recent example that required coordinated fixes.

Dan (a municipal official) and others urged that a county-administered standard would save local code officers from devising ad hoc solutions. Several speakers, including Linda (a municipal official) and members representing Ulysses and Caroline, said their staffs and clerks are likely to support a county-managed system but would expect local votes or formal approvals before any transfer of authority.

Officials also discussed resident concern about renumbering. One speaker who had led a local renumbering said residents initially voiced inconvenience but ultimately accepted the change after receiving 9-1-1 signs and updated notifications. That speaker said visible new signage and outreach eased transition.

The Council did not adopt a formal ordinance; rather, the chair asked for and recorded a majority consensus to "look into this further," and encouraged county staff to arrange a more detailed presentation with Department of Emergency Response staff for a future meeting.

Next steps: Council notes will record the consensus and county staff will seek a more in-depth presentation and implementation options, including how to handle cross-jurisdiction roads and third-party map providers' updates.