The RSU 40/MSAD 40 finance committee recommended that the district pursue a private insurance option for family medical leave instead of enrolling in the state program, after staff summarized a presentation by MSMA and projected cost savings.

A district presenter told the committee that, based on a review with MSMA, using a private carrier would allow the district to defer certain costs for 13 months and would save “approximately $122,000 for the district and equal amount for the employees,” while committing the district to a three-year contract with the vendor. The presenter said private carriers are more accustomed to administering short- and long-term leave and require more employee data for underwriting, but offered the potential for lower percentages charged to the district.

The committee discussed timing and the rollout schedule. Staff noted that the statutory timeline for benefits means employees will not be eligible to use the benefit until the effective dates already set by law (one staff timeline referenced coverage beginning May 1, 2026 for some groups); paying into a private plan does not accelerate individual eligibility. A committee member confirmed the district could return to the state plan after the three-year commitment if renewal prices changed.

Committee members called for the recommendation to move to the board. The transcript shows the committee discussed the motion and then called for approval; no roll-call tally was recorded in the meeting excerpt.

Why it matters: choosing a private carrier affects both district costs and employee benefits administration, and a multi-year commitment could limit flexibility at future renewal points.