Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision Performance Periods topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Monroe County plan commission continues Holland Field subdivision requests to June

3484836 · May 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Monroe County Plan Commission voted unanimously to continue two related subdivision performance-period extension petitions for Holland Field (SIA-22-7 and SIA-22-9) to the commission's June 17 meeting so staff and the developer can finalize design plans and cost estimates.

The Monroe County Plan Commission on a 6-0 vote on May (meeting) continued two linked petitions for Holland Field — SIA-22-7 and SIA-22-9 — to its regular meeting on June 17, 2025, after staff and the developer said final designs and cost estimates were not yet available.

Jackie Nestor Jelen, planning staff, told commissioners the developer had submitted as-built drawings for phases 1 and 2 to the Monroe County Highway Department and that Smith Design Group returned a finished draft design to the developer on May 12. Jelen recommended a continuance because staff did not yet have the new design and the cost estimate needed to set a correct performance period end date and financial guarantee amount.

The nut of the commission's discussion was scheduling and coordination. Angela Parker, attorney for Hybrid Investments LLC, which represents the developer, said the petitioner “concur[s] with the report” and asked for more time so the subdivisions’ improvement agreement, cost allocation and bond determination could be finalized. Parker said the developer planned to meet with county planning staff and the highway department between meetings to resolve outstanding items.

Commissioners asked whether a continuance would disrupt the linked Holland 3-lot minor project; Jelen said the county had approved a performance period end date that extended to next year and that a continuance here would not, by itself, create a lost deadline. After no public comment, a motion to continue both petitions to June 17, 2025, carried 6-0.

The continuance preserves the county's ability to review a new design and updated cost estimate before setting the final performance period and any adjusted financial guarantee. Staff said Blackwell Contractors Inc., the on-site contractor for a related 3-lot minor, had missed an internal deadline but that Smith Design Group and the developer were working to reconcile outstanding items.

If the petitioner provides the revised plans and cost estimates before the June meeting, staff indicated they could request administrative review with the goal of resolving bond amounts and the performance period without further continuance.