Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sex Offender Residency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kim Lemmeron approved to live at 1215 North Locust Street; board requires treatment documentation follow-up

3478448 · May 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Green Bay board approved Kim Lemmeron’s address‑specific residency at 1215 North Locust Street after reviewing her conviction for soliciting sexual images from a minor, noting she had not yet begun required offender treatment but intended to; the board conditioned oversight and required the applicant to reappear if she moves.

The Green Bay Sex Offender Residency Board approved Kim Lemmeron to live at 1215 North Locust Street after evaluating her conviction, current supervision status and plans for treatment.

Lieutenant Allen summarized the criminal complaint: Lemmeron was convicted after communicating with an undercover officer posing as a 15‑year‑old and arranging a meeting; she acknowledged a guilty verdict, a year‑and‑a‑half prison sentence and three years of probation, and told the board she remained on GPS supervision. Lemmeron told the board she has mental‑health conditions, takes prescribed medication, is currently not employed and is seeking disability benefits; she said programming and treatment were expected to start soon but that no classes had yet been completed.

Board members discussed the lack of completed SOT at the time of the hearing and debated whether to approve a move while treatment had not yet begun. One member emphasized that treatment is important to identify triggers and reduce risk; another noted the applicant had secured a security deposit and two months’ rent for the Locust Street unit and that denying the move could leave her homeless. After considering the risks and the applicant’s claimed plans to enroll in treatment, a motion to approve an address‑specific residency passed by voice vote; the board reminded Lemmeron she must return to the board before any intra‑city move and that treatment documentation would be expected if the board revokes or reviews the approval later.

The board made clear that probation and GPS supervision remain under the jurisdiction of probation staff; any compliance or registration issues must be addressed with the probation officer.