Citizen Portal

Council directs staff to design evaluation policy for direct hires; legal confirms evaluations are public records

3466745 · May 23, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council voted unanimously to direct staff to draft a performance evaluation policy and criteria for direct‑hire positions (city manager and other appointed officials). City legal advised that records of such evaluations are public records, though privileged attorney‑client material can be redacted.

Chandler City Council on May 22 unanimously directed staff to develop a written performance evaluation policy and criteria for council’s direct hires, including the city manager and other senior appointed officials.

Council member Harris introduced the item, saying the intent is to establish clear, merit‑based evaluation tools to govern merit raises and contract alignment. “When we give out merit based performance raises, we need to make sure that there's an evaluation tool to evaluate our direct hires,” Harris said.

Council and staff discussed public‑records implications. Acting legal counsel confirmed the records of evaluations are public records: "The record of the evaluation would be a public record," counsel stated during the hearing, and clarified that if an evaluation contains privileged attorney‑client legal advice it must be redacted prior to public release. The council asked staff to design a process that protects privileged material while ensuring transparency in evaluation outcomes.

Council members debated timing and scope; several said annual reviews aligned with contracts are appropriate. Members also asked staff to consider models from other cities and to present draft policy for council review. The motion to direct staff to draft the evaluation policy passed unanimously.