Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Teacher Retention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel adopts substitute bill to create Texas commission on teacher job satisfaction and retention amid debate over diversity language
Summary
The committee adopted a substitute to House Bill 22 43 to create a commission on teacher job satisfaction and retention; the substitute removed a reference to ethnic diversity in appointment language, prompting debate and a roll-call on the substitute adoption (5 ayes, 2 nays).
Get email alerts on the Teacher Retention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Committee on Education voted to adopt a committee substitute for House Bill 22 43, which would create a Texas Commission on Teacher Job Satisfaction and Retention to review rules and mandates that affect educators. The substitute and its adoption prompted debate over whether to require ethnic diversity among commission appointees.
Senator Craig (sponsor recognized on the floor as Senator Creighton) presented the substitute, saying the commission will conduct a comprehensive review of the education code to reduce overlapping mandates and outdated regulations affecting teachers. “The commission will conduct a comprehensive review of the education code, specifically aimed at reducing overlapping mandates and outdated regulations,” the sponsor said when explaining the bill substitute.
The committee substitute removed the word “ethnic” from a section describing the commission’s makeup; sponsors said the change limits the requirement to ensure geographic representation across Texas. Senator Roland West objected to removing ethnic diversity language and pressed the sponsor during questioning, saying the earlier House-drafted language had included ethnic diversity to ensure varied perspectives.
After debate, Senator King moved adoption of the committee substitute. The clerk called the roll following an objection; the roll call recorded five ayes and two nays and the committee adopted the substitute. Public testimony on the substitute was opened and closed with no witnesses appearing; the bill was left pending subject to the call of the chair.
Ending: The substitute was adopted by a recorded vote and the bill remains pending for future action by the committee.
