Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Heritage Trees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sandpoint commissioners ask historic‑preservation input as they refine 'heritage tree' definition
Summary
The Urban Forestry Commission agreed to invite the Historic Preservation Commission and local museum staff to the June meeting to help define 'heritage' and other categories for outstanding trees; commissioners said a clear purpose and documentation will guide any future code changes or nominations.
The Sandpoint Urban Forestry Commission agreed to invite members of the Historic Preservation Commission and staff from the Bonner County Museum to its June meeting to help define “heritage” and other categories for outstanding trees, Commission Chair Moe's Dunkel said during the May 22 meeting.
Commissioners said they want to clarify the purpose of a heritage-tree designation — whether it is primarily commemorative, educational, or intended to give a tree added weight in land-use or development decisions. Eric Bush, city staff liaison, told the commission the city code already references a heritage or historical tree designation and that the designation “may be designated by this commission in coordination with the historic preservation commission based on the criteria as described in the arboriculture manual.”
Why it matters: commissioners spoke repeatedly about the legal and practical limits of city authority over private trees and the value of historical documentation. Bush noted that designation can create an “additional layer of documentation” for council consideration on projects that might affect a tree, but commissioners also recognized the potential for private-property conflicts and said they will seek legal advice before pursuing code changes.
Documentation and community history: commissioners proposed using museum photographs and historic records to support nominations. Bush suggested the Bonner County Museum and the Historic Preservation Commission could help compile historical context for trees that have been present since the early 1900s; having archival photos, he said, would “really…get people engaged.”
Process and next steps: the commission asked staff to reach out to the Historic Preservation Commission and the Bonner County Museum to request their availability for the June meeting. Commissioners were asked to prepare proposed definitions and lists of candidate trees to submit to staff ahead of that meeting for compilation.
Limits and legal considerations: during the discussion staff and commissioners noted that protections for trees on private property vary by state and municipality. Bush said he had reviewed state materials and recalled that some state code language means municipalities generally cannot prohibit private owners from altering trees except where specific local designations (for example, a heritage-tree designation) have been adopted; he recommended legal review before any ordinance change.
The commission closed the discussion by directing staff to invite the Historic Preservation Commission, contact the museum for archival assistance and compile commissioner-submitted nominations and draft definitions for discussion at the June meeting.
