Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Governance Work Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses agenda for upcoming work session; cybersecurity, student mental health and fees flagged for review
Summary
Board members discussed topics for a planned work session including aligning board actions with district goals, cybersecurity, student mental health and cell-phone policy, school lunch funding (CEP), and play-to-play fees.
Board members spent a portion of the meeting discussing the agenda and objectives for an upcoming work session, seeking to align the board’s activities with district goals and prioritize a small number of high-impact tasks.
Board member Stephanie Harless said she wants the work session to focus on strategic alignment—how the board’s activities in policy, legislative monitoring and finance can best support the district’s goals. She urged the board to identify one to three concrete actions to pursue in the coming months.
Members raised several suggested presentation topics for the work session. Amber Epling Skinner asked that cybersecurity and data-protection measures be discussed, noting her experience at the City of Columbus and concern for student and staff data. Board members also proposed combining or coordinating discussion of a forthcoming state-required student cell-phone policy with student mental-health considerations.
Dr. Bowers and other members discussed school lunch programs and the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) as a potential funding mechanism; the treasurer and administration will prepare an update on lunch-program eligibility and options. The board flagged “pay-to-play” (athletic/activity) fees for inclusion on the work-session agenda following a recent student article and member interest in fee equity.
President Nikki Hudson asked members to send one to three topics that align with the district goals so she can prepare a draft work-session agenda and circulate it for feedback prior to the next meeting. The board set the work session date referenced in the meeting packet; no final decisions were made during the Aug. 20 public meeting.
Board members emphasized the need to receive background materials in advance so they can come to the work session prepared to discuss potential actions rather than only receiving presentations on the day of the meeting.
