Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Higher Ed Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

State Board executive urges broad conversation on outcomes-based funding and tuition

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The State Board's new executive director, Jen White, asked lawmakers for input on designing an outcomes-based funding framework and said any redesign should be paired with a review of tuition and affordability to protect students and incentivize completion.

Jen White, the newly appointed executive director of the Idaho State Board of Education, asked legislators for stakeholder input as the board begins work on an outcomes-based higher education funding model.

White told the Joint Legislative Sessions that the current EWA (enrollment-weighted allocation) model incentivizes recruitment and retention but that the state’s policy priorities are shifting toward student outcomes, speed-to-degree and alignment with workforce needs. She urged a concurrent review of tuition to maintain affordability while redesigning funding incentives.

White outlined key trade-offs and questions the Board staff intends to examine: whether to include nonresident students in outcome calculations; how to account for low-income and part-time students who may take longer to finish; whether and how to weight short-term certificates and CTE credentials versus longer-term degrees; and how to measure placement and earnings after graduation. She also noted the federal policy environment is evolving and may affect tuition and student-debt policy.

Lawmakers encouraged broad stakeholder participation. Several members warned that institutions will react to any formula that reallocates base funding; White acknowledged resistance is likely and said staff will model cascading fiscal impacts under different formula designs and work to build consensus. Lawmakers also recommended the Board push for better and more timely outcome data linking graduates to placement and earnings so policymakers can make apples-to-apples comparisons.

White said the Board will engage institutions, the workforce community and the legislature, and will test options and publish models and impacts before the next budget cycle.