Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Auditor Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local advocacy group asks Park County commissioners for regular auditor reports and weekly claims approvals
Summary
Impact Park County asked the Park County commissioners to add a regular agenda item for weekly approval of claims, publish the county auditor’s quarterly reports, and post monthly cost-savings reports to the county website within 30 days.
Get email alerts on the Auditor Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A local civic group asked the Park County Board of County Commissioners on May 20 to increase financial transparency by adding routine auditor reporting and weekly approval of accounts payable to commission agendas.
Sabina Strauss, a founding member of Impact Park County, read a signed request asking the commission to add a standing agenda item for weekly approval of claims and accounts payable as reviewed by the elected county auditor, to publish quarterly reports on the auditor’s examinations of county department records, and to post a monthly cost-savings report to the county website showing identified savings and any reward process for departments.
Strauss noted examples from other local bodies — the city of Livingston and the Gardiner school board — that review claims publicly and asked the commission to adopt similar practices countywide. The request asked the commission to provide a public meeting or workshop or a written explanation of the county auditor’s two primary duties: reviewing claims for compliance with county policy and law, and quarterly examinations of departmental financial records with reports to the commission.
The commissioners accepted the public comment; no formal action on the request was taken at the meeting. The board’s agenda moved to other items after the presentation. The request asked the commission to take the actions within 30 days, but the transcript does not show a formal motion or commission commitment on a timeline during the May 20 meeting.
The matter remains a public request; any change to agenda practice or publication of additional reports would require formal action by the commission or administrative staff.
