Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Health and Human Services report notes state statutes govern crisis services; county has no local stabilization facility
Summary
During review of the Health and Human Services annual report, supervisors asked about compliance with DHS statutes and whether the county operates a local rehabilitation or stabilization center; county behavioral health management said the county contracts with regional providers and does not have a local facility.
The Adams County Board accepted the Health and Human Services annual report after supervisors asked for clarifications about statutory compliance and local crisis facilities.
Supervisor Posdolski questioned language in the report and whether it correctly listed him as a member of the Health and Human Services board for the reporting period; staff clarified the report covered the 2024 calendar year and therefore included service dates that predated the current term. Posdolski also asked staff to explain “continued compliance within mental health crisis and substance use disorder according to statute chapter 34, 305, and 75,” as printed in the report.
Adam Short, behavioral health manager for Adams County, explained that the cited DHS statutes govern outpatient mental health, crisis services and substance‑use services and that the county complies by meeting statutory program requirements and DHS interpretations: “That is meeting the statutory requirements as they are written and as there are different acts and interpretations legally from DHS that come down,” Short said.
Short also told supervisors that the county currently “contracts with other regional providers for crisis services” and that the annual report did not include a facility‑level plan for a stabilization or rehabilitation center in Adams County. When asked directly whether a rehabilitation stabilization center exists within Adams County, Short replied, “No. There's not.”
Supervisors accepted the report after correcting the membership listing and hearing the staff clarifications. The board’s acceptance vote included at least one dissenting vote noted in the record; the report will remain subject to departmental follow‑up for any requested corrections or additional clarifications.
