Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Plat topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DRC reviews Crossroads at Kelly Park Phase 2B plat; 90 homes, CDD maintenance flagged
Summary
The City of Apopka Development Review Committee reviewed a Phase 2B plat for Crossroads at Kelly Park covering 90 single-family lots and discussed which infrastructure the Kelly Park Community Development District will maintain, dedication accuracy and potential traffic calming on long straightaways.
The City of Apopka Development Review Committee on May 21 reviewed the Phase 2B plat for Crossroads at Kelly Park, a proposed subdivision of 90 single-family residential lots, and discussed which infrastructure the Kelly Park Community Development District will maintain versus what the city will own.
The plat, presented to the DRC by Jean Sanchez, the project manager, records 90 single-family residential units in Crossroads at Kelly Park. The committee discussed dedications, homeowner association references and a separate Kelly Park Community Development District (CDD) that the plat text indicates will assume maintenance of some infrastructure, including landscaping islands and portions of the drainage system.
The discussion focused on clarifying which elements remain city property and which the CDD will maintain. City staff noted rights-of-way shown on the plat are dedicated to the city, while drainage and some storm infrastructure appear to be within the CDD’s maintenance responsibility. The city engineer, Vladimir Simonovsky, confirmed he reviewed the dedications and asked for formal confirmation that the plat language accurately reflects who will maintain which systems.
Committee members asked staff to confirm the CDD’s enabling documents and any limits on the district’s responsibilities. The DRC also flagged the presence of an HOA in the submitted documents and asked legal counsel to reconcile the HOA provisions with the CDD agreement.
Members raised traffic-calming concerns for long north–south straightaways within the subdivision. Staff said they would compare the plat to the previously approved construction site plan to confirm whether traffic-calming measures (for example, curb extensions, on-street parking, stop signs or small roundabouts) were already included on the construction drawings. The DRC asked staff to return any relevant approved construction site plan details to the committee for confirmation.
No formal motion or vote was recorded during the discussion; staff directed follow-up checks on plat dedications, CDD language, and the approved construction site plan to confirm traffic-calming provisions and utility responsibilities.
