Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Privacy Device Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Burnsville school committee narrows device-recording ban, sends policy to first reading
Summary
The policy committee reviewed revisions to the district's device-recording policy, including specific prohibited locations, response levels for violations and cross-references to the bullying policy; the draft was advanced for first reading while regulations will be developed to clarify enforcement levels.
The Burnsville Public School District policy committee on an unspecified date reviewed proposed language that would discourage recording or photographing someone without permission and would specifically prohibit such recordings in bathrooms, locker rooms, school buses and during instructional time.
The change matters because committee members said narrowly targeting places where privacy is expected should make the rule clearer and easier to enforce while staff develop regulations to define how responses escalate for violations.
Dr. Belmont, who presented the draft, read a recommended line from legal counsel: “the school district strongly discourages and disfavors using a device to record or photograph someone without their permission.” She told committee members the draft removes a blanket prohibition on all spaces and instead names locations where prohibition is thought to be most appropriate. Committee members discussed section 7 (responses to violations) and said the policy needs clearer guidance about when an incident is treated as a first, second or third-level response.
Committee members asked whether the level system is strictly progressive (first offense, second offense, third offense) or whether a single incident could jump immediately to a higher level depending on severity. One member said the student handbook contains varying levels of response and that the policy should align with existing handbook language. Dr. Belmont said the goal is to give administrators enough flexibility to respond to different circumstances while also giving them clarity to be consistent.
Members also asked staff to cross-reference the district's anti-bullying policy (policy 514) because recording used as a bullying tool may already be addressed there. The committee agreed that references to “school buildings” in section 8(b) were potentially confusing and struck that phrase from the draft. Several members suggested explicitly listing locker rooms, bathrooms and buses under the prohibited-locations paragraph; presenters acknowledged those additions and agreed to include them.
The committee advanced the revised policy to first reading, with the understanding that administrative regulations will be drafted and returned to clarify how levels of response are applied in practice and to ensure consistency with the student handbook and bullying policy.
