Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Train Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents push Pleasanton for downtown train 'quiet zone'; council hears petition and feasibility caveats
Summary
Several Pleasanton residents told the City Council May 20 that frequent nighttime train horn blasts in the downtown area are disrupting sleep and public health and urged the council to fund a study and pursue a Federal Railroad Administration quiet zone.
Residents asking the Pleasanton City Council to pursue a Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) “quiet zone” for downtown spoke at length during public comment May 20, asking the council to allocate seed funding to study whether the city can reduce nighttime train horn noise.
Speakers said freight and passenger trains have become louder and more frequent at night and that horn blasts disrupt sleep, study, and community life. Dr. Asim (an internal medicine physician) told the council such nocturnal noise can increase cardiovascular and mental‑health risks and impair children’s learning. Several residents described a rapid petition drive; Jim Lierman told council volunteers had gathered roughly 170 signatures in three weeks supporting a quiet zone in downtown Pleasanton.
Council staff said the topic had been included in the capital/transportation prioritization process but ranked below other projects for funding. City staff and engineering consultants said a professional FRA‑oriented feasibility and design study would generally be required before any grant or implementation work could proceed; staff estimated an initial study could cost on the order of $125,000 and would identify whether low‑cost supplemental safety measures would be sufficient or whether larger intersection gating or infrastructure changes — potentially costing hundreds of thousands or more — would be required.
Speakers urged the city to allocate seed money to fund the study and to pursue state and federal grant programs that could pay for implementation. Council members asked staff clarifying technical questions; staff said advancing a quiet‑zone study would require re‑prioritizing existing CIP requests or adding the study as a new CIP item. Staff said results could enable applications for FRA and state grant opportunities if the technical review shows feasible, lower‑cost supplemental safety measures.
Council did not vote on a study allocation during the May 20 meeting; staff said the project could be considered in the next CIP update if council prioritizes it.
