Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the White Oaks Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Large townhouse proposal on White Oaks Road draws heavy opposition; board tables application
Summary
Developers seeking to build 24 townhouse units on a 10‑acre White Oaks Road parcel met sustained opposition from nearby residents concerned about density, traffic and preserving the corridor’s rural character; the board agreed to continue the application for one month.
Get email alerts on the White Oaks Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers Tony Dion and Peter Grenier presented a conceptual plan to the Laconia Zoning Board of Adjustment to build a “village‑style” collection of 24 townhouse units (12 duplex buildings) on roughly 10 acres at 238 White Oaks Road. Board members and numerous residents objected to the density, potential traffic impacts and the proposal’s fit with the long‑standing rural character of the White Oaks corridor.
Attorney John Cronin, representing the applicants, described a layout of duplex/townhouse units that the development team said could provide additional housing choices for buyers who want to live in the Lakes Region in a lower‑maintenance product than waterfront homes. Cronin said the team had shown the plan to the Planning Board and would expect further site‑level review, including traffic and fire‑safety analysis, if the board moved the variance application forward.
Abutters and community members strongly opposed the request. Attorney Phillip Pott, speaking for neighbors, argued the town’s RR‑2 residential corridor rules were designed “to recognize the historic, scenic and agricultural values” of White Oaks, Parade and Meredith Center roads and said granting the variance would “eliminate that objective.” Longtime residents raised concerns about water supply and fire suppression — one resident noted the nearest hydrant is more than 1,500 feet away — and many said they bought homes in the area for its low density and open character.
Board members acknowledged the intensity of concern and that the property is sizable and visible from Weirs Boulevard and other local routes. Attorney Cronin asked for time to negotiate with abutters and to return with refinements; the board voted to continue — without prejudice — for one month so applicants and neighbors could meet and the board could see any revised plans. The board recorded the continuation and scheduled the matter for the next meeting.

