Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 353 Otter River Driveway Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Gardner ZBA grants variance for second driveway at 353 Otter River Road citing lot constraints

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Zoning Board approved a variance allowing Jonathan Augusto to add a second driveway to access a storage building behind his home at 353 Otter River Road, finding that topography, well and septic locations and riverfront constraints limited on‑site access from other sides.

The Gardner Zoning Board of Appeals voted May 20 to grant a variance permitting a second driveway at 353 Otter River Road so property owner Jonathan Augusto can access a storage building at the rear of his parcel.

Augusto explained he owns a large, roughly triangular parcel that narrows toward the road, with wetlands and the Otter River bordering the rear and a septic system located behind the house. He said the proposed second driveway would be a straight, flat approach on the right side of his house that avoids disturbing the septic and wetlands and provides practical access to a storage building on an abutting parcel where he performs maintenance of his land. Augusto stated he would gravel the drive initially and pave later.

Board members inspected photo exhibits and asked for the driveway's width and construction method; Augusto said it would be a gravel surface initially and that he planned to keep it out of neighbors' sight lines. No abutters objected at the hearing. The board discussed whether the proposal created a safety hazard and whether it met the three‑part variance standard (no substantial detriment to public good, hardship related to property circumstances, and preservation of zoning intent). After discussion, a motion to approve the variance carried unanimously.

Implementation notes: Board members and staff reminded Augusto to await the 20‑day appeal period and to record the board decision at the registry of deeds before commencing construction. The board will issue a formal written decision within two weeks, and construction may proceed only after any appeal period expires and the decision is recorded as required.