Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Legislation SB974 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff warns SB 974 could shift approvals and create appeal-pathway conflict for Madison County zoning decisions
Summary
County planning staff briefed the Board of Zoning Appeals on Senate Bill 974 and redlined county ordinance changes; staff said the bill moves some subdivision and site-plan approvals to designated agents and that current language could send appeals to circuit court, creating a conflict with local appeal routes to the BZA.
Madison County planning staff told the Board of Zoning Appeals that Senate Bill 974 will change how some subdivision and site-plan approvals are processed and could increase appeals to county decision bodies and to circuit court.
Alan, county planning staff, said he had redlined the county ordinances to comply with the new state law and that the redlined draft and the bill text were in the planning commission packet. "Approvals of subdivisions and site plans are moving ... to a designated agent," Alan told the board, and he added there is "a rub" in the statute because the bill’s language appears to send appeals to the circuit court rather than to the Board of Zoning Appeals for decisions made by an administrator.
Alan said the county attorney is working to resolve the conflict between the bill’s language and existing state code provisions that historically direct appeals of administrative decisions to the Board of Zoning Appeals. He told members the county will present the redlined ordinance revisions to the Planning Commission at an informational session the next night and that the Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider the revisions on May 27, when the Board likely will set a public hearing date for adoption.
Board members asked how the changes will affect the BZA; staff replied that the board could "hear more appeals" from applicants denied by an administrator and that staff would send the redline to the BZA members for review. Alan said he would provide the redlined packet to the board and that a more complete version should be available by the Board of Supervisors meeting.
No formal action was taken by the BZA at the meeting; staff described the item as informational and outlined next steps for review and for a public hearing process before the Board of Supervisors.
