Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Exceptions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears briefing on $1.8 million in 2024 budget exceptions; IT delays, pensionable claims cited
Summary
Seattle's Finance Committee received a briefing May 21 on a council ordinance seeking $1.8 million in retroactive adjustments to the 2024 budget, citing $1.1 million for industrial insurance pensionable claims and $658,000 for unanticipated law-department costs tied to an IT transition and payroll system issues.
Get email alerts on the Budget Exceptions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Seattle's Finance, Native Communities and Tribal Governments Committee on May 21 received a briefing on an exceptions ordinance that would retroactively add $1.8 million to the city's 2024 budget.
Ben Noble, director of central staff, told the committee the request takes two forms: a $1.1 million increase to the industrial insurance fund managed for payroll-bearing departments to cover large, pensionable injury claims, and $658,000 for the Law Department to cover unanticipated costs tied to a delayed criminal case management system and Workday implementation issues.
The exceptions ordinance would amend Ordinance 01/6955, the ordinance that adopted the 2024 budget and the 2024โ2029 Capital Improvement Program. Noble and Tom Meiksel of council central staff framed the request as a routine, after-the-fact cleanup step: Meiksel said, "this is the smallest exceptions bill in the history, in the history that we've been tracking." The presenters and committee members noted the city has seen a downward trend in the number and dollar amount of exceptions in recent years.
Why it matters: Exceptions formally increase last year's adopted budget to reflect costs that exceeded departmental authority. The committee was told the industrial insurance request responds to unpredictable, high-cost pensionable claims for employees who cannot return to work. The law-department request reflects extra licensing, personnel and transition costs after implementation delays. Vice Chair Rivera questioned whether the industrial-insurance charge is collected centrally; Noble explained it is a citywide charge assessed to payroll-bearing departments and pooled in an industrial insurance fund that the City Budget Office forecasts and manages.
Committee members pressed for accountability and follow-up. Noble and Meiksel said the Budget Office has stepped up budget-to-actual monitoring under a fiscal-transparency program and that the Law Department and Budget Office agreed to more regular check-ins to avoid repeat exceptions. Council member Kettle noted that the Seattle Municipal Court's case-management system was up and that the remaining data-exchange issues reported earlier appear to be fixed.
Next steps: Central staff said the exceptions ordinance requires a three-quarter council vote for adoption. Central staff scheduled a second briefing and possible vote in the Select Budget Committee on June 4, with a final vote on the full council docket on June 10.
The item was a briefing; the committee took no vote on May 21.

